Disney’s “Special” Copyright Protection

Jun 09, 2022 | Law Student Blog,

Disney’s “Special” Copyright Protection

By Mariah Zollinger
Saint Louis University School of Law
Juris Doctor Candidate, 2023

Some lawmakers, specifically Senator Josh Hawley of Missouri, have been taking notice of large companies seemingly benefiting more from copyright protection than smaller businesses and individuals. Some would say that this has to do with the fact that Hollywood has lawmakers and even the Copyright Office in its back pocket. However, it could also be argued that some works are so long-lasting, iconic, and integral to the operations of such businesses that they could use these additional protections more than smaller businesses or individuals, and so long as all entities are treated equally, this isn’t a problem.

Most recently, Senator Hawley has been calling out Disney for its “special” copyright protections, as we approach the year 2024 when Disney’s Mickey Mouse character goes into the public domain and the company will lose certain copyright rights associated with it and other properties. Additionally, this call by Senator Hawley comes not long after Disney’s top IP lawyer became General Counsel of the Copyright Office and Disney’s opposition to Florida’s “Don’t Say Gay” bill. Some believe that situations like this are why the public does not support the idea of long and strong copyright protection. It seems that there has been a trend that attorneys do not get top jobs at the Copyright Office unless they have experience working for one of the movie or recording industry organizations. This belief amplifies some people’s distrust in the nature of copyrights and the Copyright Office.

Senator Hawley proposed the Copyright Clause Restoration Act on May 10, 2022. This is a new bill to strip corporations like Disney of “special copyright protections.” Senator Hawley’s bill would limit new copyright protections to 56 years and make the change retroactive for massive corporations like Disney that have arguably benefited from what some think is unnecessarily long copyright protection by means of term extensions. Under current law, companies like Disney have been granted copyright protection for up to 120 years from the creation of a work—well beyond the original maximum of 28 years with the possibility of renewal for another 14 years. If it became law, Senator Hawley’s bill would crack down on copyright “monopolies” by ensuring that they only last long enough, in his mind, to encourage innovation.

However, Disney has recognized how untenable an even further copyright term extension would be. Further,  it hasn’t really been lobbying for it despite the fact that copyright protection will soon be coming to an end for some of its most valuable properties. Ever since the last copyright term extension in 1998, Hollywood and other media powers have mostly accepted the public domain status of works first created 95 years ago or earlier. The reality is that Disney has the exact same protections as everyone else. The difference is that Disney and other corporations like it specifically lobbied for, and had the clout to help facilitate, the current protections, which were extended to all similarly situated copyright holders. So, all benefited from this legislation and, therefore, these so-called “special” protections simply do not exist.

Our 2022 summer associate program is sponsored by:

Bar Plan logo